"Comparing Colonial Education Discourses in the French and Portuguese African Empires." In International Handbook of Comparative Education by
This two-volume compendium brings together leading scholars from around the world who provide authoritative studies of the old and new epistemic motifs and theoretical strands that have characterized the interdisciplinary field of comparative and international education in the last 50 years. It analyses the shifting agendas of scholarly research, the different intellectual and ideological perspectives and the changing methodological approaches used to examine and interpret education and pedagogy across different political formations, societies and cultures.
Learning to Divide the World by
This examination of the colonial legacy of education considers the correlations between education and conquest. It offers an account of the way that imperialism''s educational legacy continues to separate into black and white, east and west.'
Burman, E. (2019). Child as method: implications for decolonising educational research. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 28(1), 4-26.
Fallace, T.D. (2015). The savage origins of child-centered pedagogy, 1871-1913. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 73-103.
Fletcher, L. (1982). Early British colonial school inspectors: Agents of imperialism? History of Education, 11(4), 281– 310.
Hall, C. (2008). Making colonial subjects: education in the age of empire. History of Education, 37(6), 773-787.
Mackenzie, C. G. (1993). Demythologising the missionaries: a reassessment of the functions and relationships of Christian missionary education under colonialism. Comparative education, 29(1), 45-66.
Nóvoa, A. (1995). On history, history of education, and history of colonial education. Paedagogica Historica, 31, 23-64.
Reichgelt, M. (2020). Children as Protagonists in Colonial History: Watching Missionary Photography. BMGN-Low Countries Historical Review, 135(3-4), 80-105.
Simpson, M. K. (2007). From Savage to Citizen: Education, Colonialism and Idiocy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(5), p. 561-574.