Skip to Main Content
Help

Cambridge LibGuides

Find out more about our library services, facilities and resources

Managing Data

Sharing data

Sharing raw data is still a new concept for many researchers who are more used to using it as part of a finished product such as a book chapter or journal article. As part of the wider Open Research movement, data sharing is becoming increasingly common and researchers often need help to adequately prepare and distribute their information. This is an ideal place for library staff to step in and help.

Why do researchers need to share their data?

There are many reasons why researchers share their data and the particular balance is likely to be unique to the individual researcher. These can often be split into the philosophical arguments for good research practices and the incentives which mean that researchers must share their data - a carrot and a stick approach.

 

  • Scholarship relies on the principle that researchers share their findings in order to move knowledge forward. Sharing the data which underpins publications helps to inform new work and contribute to this advancement.
  • Sharing data can lead to an increase in citations for the researcher. The more outputs that a researcher shares, the greater the likelihood that they will be cited which can have a positive impact on their future career.
  • Although it may seem complicated at the time, sharing their data can save the author time in the end. Other researchers regularly seek out the data from similar projects and if it has been shared in a single, stable place the author has somewhere to point them towards rather than answering multiple queries. 
  • It is important to share negative results as well as positive ones. Researchers have historically focused on sharing only positive outcomes of their work but this means that both time and money is wasted repeating projects looking at something already proven not to work. Making the results of a project available, even if they are not linked to a publication, can help to ensure that research funding is spent wisely.
  • The research reproducibility crisis is having a major impact on the move towards sharing data, particularly in the sciences. In theory anyone should be able to repeat an experiment with the same inputs and conditions and expect the same results. To accomplish this it is vital to have the data from the original experiment available for scrutiny. According to a survey by the journal Nature, 70% of researchers have failed to reproduce studies carried out by others and more than 50% are unable to replicate their own work! Being able to reproduce research is vital in promoting good practice and ensuring that research integrity is preserved. 

 

 

  • Sharing data helps to prevent research misconduct where results are deliberately falsified in order to provide a more positive outcome. This is dangerous as it undermines good research practices and risks false results getting into the public arena. There have recently been several high profile cases of this which often have far reaching consequences
  • Perhaps the main reason that researchers are sharing their data is that their funding bodies mandate that the data underpinning publications produced as a result of their grants is made available. This is something now ordered by a wide range of funders who are aiming to make the results of the work they fund as widely available as possible.

 

Researchers will respond to different arguments in different ways and librarians will find that they need to fine tune their response according to who they are talking to. The 'stick' approach tends to have more of an impact as researchers must comply or risk losing their funding or even their academic reputation. 

Concerns around data sharing

Many researchers have expressed concerns around sharing their data. It is important that librarians understand and respond to these concerns in case researchers are misinformed when seeking help. 

Researchers often worry about the possibility of being scooped by a rival research group when sharing raw data. This is particularly true in disciplines where much of the final output is down to the interpretation of the researcher rather than undisputable results. In fact, sharing data can help to protect against theft and plagiarism as it automatically date stamps anything which has been shared. Sharing data is yet another thing that already time pressured researchers have to think about during their project and they often see it as a burden rather than a natural part of the process. For many researchers sharing their information conflicts with the issue of sensitive data - how can they be expected to share information when it could identify their participants? Research funders are aware of this issue and will make allowances for personally or commercially sensitive data, usually in the form of an embargo which allows the researcher to restrict public access.

How is data shared?

There is no one simple way of sharing data which covers all funders and disciplines and best practice is to follow the specific guidance provided by each funder. There are however some general principles which researchers should follow to make sure that they have adequately fulfilled their obligations. 

Data should be:

  • Stored for at least ten years. This is sometimes ten years from the creation date and sometimes ten years from the date of the last access to the data. 
  • Described using in-depth and accurate metadata to help make it meaningful to others who may want to use it in their own work. This also helps to offer longevity to the data. 
  • Stored in a suitable repository. This could be an institutional repository, a format specific repository or a general repository which accepts all types of data. Uploading information to a repository helps to preserve the data and offers a stable link for sharing. 
  • Linked to from the main publication in order to tie the two together and make the data more discoverable for those seeking it. 

The concept of sharing data is still scary for many researchers and they are likely to have many questions about both 'why' and 'how' they should do this. Library staff may find that they need to be patient when explaining this and cover the same topic in a range of ways in order to make the message stick.

© Cambridge University Libraries | Accessibility | Privacy policy | Log into LibApps